Comments on: Man accidentally tasered in the groin by police http://swns.com/man-accidentally-tasered-in-the-groin-by-police-201026.html Small World News Service Fri, 03 Feb 2012 07:51:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: Tom Dick http://swns.com/man-accidentally-tasered-in-the-groin-by-police-201026.html/comment-page-1#comment-4882 Tom Dick Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:17:42 +0000 http://swns.com/?p=4257#comment-4882 That's funny lol That's funny lol

]]> By: Tom Dick http://swns.com/man-accidentally-tasered-in-the-groin-by-police-201026.html/comment-page-1#comment-12658 Tom Dick Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:17:00 +0000 http://swns.com/?p=4257#comment-12658 That's funny lol That's funny lol

]]> By: Not another 'Br http://swns.com/man-accidentally-tasered-in-the-groin-by-police-201026.html/comment-page-1#comment-4059 Not another 'Br Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:06:17 +0000 http://swns.com/?p=4257#comment-4059 It's interesting that this officer has admitted 'accidently' discharging an offensive weapon. The fact that no Statements were needed by the Police should make a claim for compensation easy. If I were Mr Cox, i'd be asking my Solicitor to obtain a statement from the Police regarding all events. Including why an officer, with all the state of the art links to Insurance Databases would believe Mr Cox was driving an uninsured vehicle in the first place (It should be easy to determine if such a search was made). So it appears we have the driver of a vehicle being stopped without reason, the 'accidental' discharge of a tazer and the lack of statements capturing the events leading up to & following the incapacitation of Mr Cox. I suspect a decent pay off will be offered outside of the courtroom & no further action taken against the Officer involved. It's interesting that this officer has admitted 'accidently' discharging an offensive weapon. The fact that no Statements were needed by the Police should make a claim for compensation easy. If I were Mr Cox, i'd be asking my Solicitor to obtain a statement from the Police regarding all events. Including why an officer, with all the state of the art links to Insurance Databases would believe Mr Cox was driving an uninsured vehicle in the first place (It should be easy to determine if such a search was made).

So it appears we have the driver of a vehicle being stopped without reason, the 'accidental' discharge of a tazer and the lack of statements capturing the events leading up to & following the incapacitation of Mr Cox. I suspect a decent pay off will be offered outside of the courtroom & no further action taken against the Officer involved.

]]> By: Not another 'Br http://swns.com/man-accidentally-tasered-in-the-groin-by-police-201026.html/comment-page-1#comment-12657 Not another 'Br Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:06:00 +0000 http://swns.com/?p=4257#comment-12657 It's interesting that this officer has admitted 'accidently' discharging an offensive weapon. The fact that no Statements were needed by the Police should make a claim for compensation easy. If I were Mr Cox, i'd be asking my Solicitor to obtain a statement from the Police regarding all events. Including why an officer, with all the state of the art links to Insurance Databases would believe Mr Cox was driving an uninsured vehicle in the first place (It should be easy to determine if such a search was made). So it appears we have the driver of a vehicle being stopped without reason, the 'accidental' discharge of a tazer and the lack of statements capturing the events leading up to & following the incapacitation of Mr Cox. I suspect a decent pay off will be offered outside of the courtroom & no further action taken against the Officer involved. It's interesting that this officer has admitted 'accidently' discharging an offensive weapon. The fact that no Statements were needed by the Police should make a claim for compensation easy. If I were Mr Cox, i'd be asking my Solicitor to obtain a statement from the Police regarding all events. Including why an officer, with all the state of the art links to Insurance Databases would believe Mr Cox was driving an uninsured vehicle in the first place (It should be easy to determine if such a search was made).

So it appears we have the driver of a vehicle being stopped without reason, the 'accidental' discharge of a tazer and the lack of statements capturing the events leading up to & following the incapacitation of Mr Cox. I suspect a decent pay off will be offered outside of the courtroom & no further action taken against the Officer involved.

]]> By: Ken http://swns.com/man-accidentally-tasered-in-the-groin-by-police-201026.html/comment-page-1#comment-3968 Ken Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:00:04 +0000 http://swns.com/?p=4257#comment-3968 And the reason that the taser was accidentally pulled in the first place? When the revolution comes to your area remember which side the cops are on. And the reason that the taser was accidentally pulled in the first place? When the revolution comes to your area remember which side the cops are on.

]]> By: Ken http://swns.com/man-accidentally-tasered-in-the-groin-by-police-201026.html/comment-page-1#comment-12656 Ken Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:00:00 +0000 http://swns.com/?p=4257#comment-12656 And the reason that the taser was accidentally pulled in the first place? When the revolution comes to your area remember which side the cops are on. And the reason that the taser was accidentally pulled in the first place? When the revolution comes to your area remember which side the cops are on.

]]> By: Wat http://swns.com/man-accidentally-tasered-in-the-groin-by-police-201026.html/comment-page-1#comment-3950 Wat Wed, 21 Jul 2010 05:08:31 +0000 http://swns.com/?p=4257#comment-3950 Leave it to the "professionals" to "accidentally" discharge a weapon. FACT: Someone has to actually pull the blasted trigger....It won't go off by itself......Cops are never around when you need one and always in the way when their not needed. Even if they show up, like this one they always seem to screw it up. maybe a higher intelligence level employees are what is required...you think?????? Leave it to the "professionals" to "accidentally" discharge a weapon. FACT: Someone has to actually pull the blasted trigger….It won't go off by itself……Cops are never around when you need one and always in the way when their not needed. Even if they show up, like this one they always seem to screw it up. maybe a higher intelligence level employees are what is required…you think??????

]]> By: Wat http://swns.com/man-accidentally-tasered-in-the-groin-by-police-201026.html/comment-page-1#comment-12655 Wat Wed, 21 Jul 2010 05:08:00 +0000 http://swns.com/?p=4257#comment-12655 Leave it to the "professionals" to "accidentally" discharge a weapon. FACT: Someone has to actually pull the blasted trigger....It won't go off by itself......Cops are never around when you need one and always in the way when their not needed. Even if they show up, like this one they always seem to screw it up. maybe a higher intelligence level employees are what is required...you think?????? Leave it to the "professionals" to "accidentally" discharge a weapon. FACT: Someone has to actually pull the blasted trigger….It won't go off by itself……Cops are never around when you need one and always in the way when their not needed. Even if they show up, like this one they always seem to screw it up. maybe a higher intelligence level employees are what is required…you think??????

]]> By: AC http://swns.com/man-accidentally-tasered-in-the-groin-by-police-201026.html/comment-page-1#comment-3907 AC Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:57:32 +0000 http://swns.com/?p=4257#comment-3907 Right. "Accidentally" tasered in the jewels. Repeatedly, right? I foresee a court ruling it to be a self-inflicted injury, and then fining him. Right. "Accidentally" tasered in the jewels. Repeatedly, right? I foresee a court ruling it to be a self-inflicted injury, and then fining him.

]]> By: AC http://swns.com/man-accidentally-tasered-in-the-groin-by-police-201026.html/comment-page-1#comment-12654 AC Tue, 20 Jul 2010 19:57:00 +0000 http://swns.com/?p=4257#comment-12654 Right. "Accidentally" tasered in the jewels. Repeatedly, right? I foresee a court ruling it to be a self-inflicted injury, and then fining him. Right. "Accidentally" tasered in the jewels. Repeatedly, right? I foresee a court ruling it to be a self-inflicted injury, and then fining him.

]]>